NMM/OMTREVIEW ARTICLE

Effect of manual manipulation on mechanical gait parameters

Solomon B. Yanuck, BA; Sarah K. Fox, BS; Bethany R. Harting, BA; and Thomas M. Motyka, DO, MHPE
Notes and Affiliations
Notes and Affiliations

Received: August 31, 2023

Accepted: April 9, 2024

Published: May 30, 2024

  • Solomon B. Yanuck, BA, 

    Leon Levine Hall of Medical Sciences,
    364432
    Campbell University Jerry M. Wallace School of Osteopathic Medicine
    , Lillington, NC, USA

  • Sarah K. Fox, BS, 

    Leon Levine Hall of Medical Sciences,
    364432
    Campbell University Jerry M. Wallace School of Osteopathic Medicine
    , Lillington, NC, USA

  • Bethany R. Harting, BA, 

    Leon Levine Hall of Medical Sciences,
    364432
    Campbell University Jerry M. Wallace School of Osteopathic Medicine
    , Lillington, NC, USA

  • Thomas M. Motyka, DO, MHPE, 

    Department of Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine,
    364432
    Campbell University Jerry M. Wallace School of Osteopathic Medicine
    , Lillington, NC, USA

J Osteopath Med; 124(10): 437-446
Abstract

Context: A variety of manual manipulation techniques are utilized in clinical practice to alleviate pain and improve musculoskeletal function. Many manual practitioners analyze gait patterns and asymmetries in their assessment of the patient, and an increasing number of gait motion capture studies are taking place with recent improvements in motion capture technology. This study is the first systematic review of whether these manual modalities have been shown to produce an objectively measurable change in gait mechanics.

Objectives: This study was designed to perform a systematic review of the literature to assess the impact of manual medicine modalities on biomechanical parameters of gait.

Methods: A master search term composed of keywords and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) search terms from an initial scan of relevant articles was utilized to search six databases. We screened the titles and abstracts of the resulting papers for relevance and then assessed their quality with the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Clinical trials that featured both a manual manipulation intervention and multiple mechanical gait parameters were included. Case reports and other studies that only measured gait speed or other subjective measures of mobility were excluded.

Results: We included 20 studies in our final analysis. They utilize manipulation techniques primarily from osteopathic, chiropractic, massage, and physiotherapy backgrounds. The conditions studied primarily included problems with the back, knee, and ankle, as well as healthy patients and Parkinson’s patients. Control groups were highly variable, if not absent. Most studies measured their gait parameters utilizing either multicamera motion capture systems or force platforms.

Conclusions: Twelve of 20 papers included in the final analysis demonstrated a significant effect of manipulation on gait variables, many of which included either step length, walking speed, or sagittal range of motion (ROM) in joints of the lower extremity. However, the results and study design are too heterogeneous to draw robust conclusions from these studies as a whole. While there are initial indications that certain modalities may yield a change in certain gait parameters, the quality of evidence is low and there is insufficient evidence to conclude that manual therapies induce changes in biomechanical gait parameters. Studies are heterogeneous with respect to the populations studied and the interventions performed. Comparators were variable or absent across the studies, as were the outcome variables measured. More could be learned in the future with consistent methodology around blinding and sham treatment, and if the gait parameters measured were standardized and of a more robust clinical significance.

Read Full Article