NMM/OMTReview ArticleCME

Support for osteopathic manipulative treatment inclusion in chronic pain management guidelines: a narrative review

Megan Franzetti, MPH; Emily Dries; Brady Stevens; Lisa Berkowitz; and Sheldon C. Yao, DO
Notes and Affiliations
Notes and Affiliations

Received: November 3, 2019

Accepted: July 23, 2020

Published: February 22, 2021

  • Megan Franzetti, MPH, 

    College of Osteopathic Medicine, New York Institute of Technology, Old Westbury, NY, USA

  • Emily Dries, , 

    College of Osteopathic Medicine, New York Institute of Technology, Old Westbury, NY, USA

  • Brady Stevens, , 

    College of Osteopathic Medicine, New York Institute of Technology, Old Westbury, NY, USA

  • Lisa Berkowitz, , 

    College of Osteopathic Medicine, New York Institute of Technology, Old Westbury, NY, USA

  • Sheldon C. Yao, DO, 

    Department of Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine, New York Institute of Technology, Old Westbury, NY, USA

J Osteopath Med; 121(3): 307-317
Abstract

Context: Osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) is used to treat chronic pain conditions. However, few guidelines focusing on chronic pain management include recommendations for OMT.

Objectives: To evaluate previous literature on the use of OMT for improving chronic pain.

Methods: A literature search was conducted on MEDLINE/PubMed and ScienceDirect on August 26–27, 2019, using the terms “osteopathic,” “chronic,” and “pain,” yielding a total of 312 MEDLINE/PubMed articles and 515 ScienceDirect articles. Eligibility criteria required that studies investigate pain, functional status, or medication usage through an experimental design, focusing on human subjects with chronic pain who had various forms of OMT administered by osteopathically trained individuals in which the comparator group received no intervention, a sham or placebo, or conventional care. Three authors independently performed literature searches and methodically settled disagreements over article selection.

Results: In the 22 articles included in our study that examined OMT use in chronic pain conditions, we evaluated primary outcomes of pain (22; 100%) and functional status (20; 90.9%), and the secondary outcome of medication usage (3; 13.6%). The majority of articles showed that OMT resulted in a significant decrease in pain levels as compared to baseline pain levels or the control group (20; 90.9%) and that OMT resulted in an improvement in functional status (17; 77.3%). In articles that did not find a significant difference in pain (2; 9.1%) or functional status (3; 13.6%), there were overall outcomes improvements noted. All articles that investigated medication usage (3; 13.6%) showed that OMT was effective in decreasing patients’ medication usage. Our study was limited by its small sample size and multimodal comparator group exclusion.

Conclusions: OMT provides an evidence-based management option to reduce pain levels, improve functional status, and decrease medication usage in chronic pain conditions, especially low back pain (LBP). Pain management guidelines should include OMT as a resource to alleviate chronic pain.

Read Full Article